Friday, December 2, 2011

Gay friendly homophobia

In memoriam of
Jandre Botha 
martyr of Truth
This 4 year old innocent child was brutally battered to death by the lesbian pair of his mother because he refused to call her “Daddy” : "fractured skull and brain damage, as well as broken legs, collarbone, hands and pelvis." His mother was around and did nothing to prevent it! He had been battered before and social services dismissed the father's complaint.

He gave his life so that things like this would never ever happen again. If we don't do something about it, we will be accomplices of future murders.
Rest in peace little one: your sacrifice will not be in vain.
Please pray for the conversion of sinners, especially his killer and mom.

This article is not about homosexuality (a tendency or same sex attraction) but about homosex, the practice of homosexuality which according to science harms not only the homosexuals but also their partners, friends and society. A celibate homosexual could lead a normal life and escape the horrible statistics of homosex.

Before degrading yourself by anti-scientific, irrational and ad hominem comments, please take time to really study this life/death issue. If you reply, don't waste everybody's time: please quote the exact phrase and refute it with objective scientific evidence. Don't kill the messenger!

Social suicide: contamination of blood banks!

The anti-scientific gender ideology is really dangerous: for instance, you might die because of a gay transfusion, since:
a) the Center for Disease Control of the USA and  similar agencies from other countries, have identified homosexual intercourse as the main vector behind the AIDS epidemic.
b) it will be forbidden to ask blood donors if they had homosex,
c) current blood screening is not 100% effective.

UK lifts total ban on gay men donating blood

Canadian Blood Services seeks end to gay donor ban

Rights: let's talk straight

Nazism, which won democratic elections, taught us that human rights should never be based on consensus but on human dignity. Nazism also taught us that nobody has the right to define that the "other" is a sub-human without rights (Jews, gypsies, polish, Catholics, homosexuals). Sub-human rights are inhuman rights. Check this wonderful documentary:

Homosexuals should be respected and loved like any other human being (including comatose patients and embryos).

Human dignity does not derive from consensus but from the immortal soul, which can be scientifically proven:
For instance, cockroaches have no freedom of will and therefore have no rights per se.

If someone enjoys a right this means someone is obliged to provide it. For every right there is an obligation. Since "freedom of will" means accountability, then for every right there must be an obligation. According to natural law, heterosexual marriage (man and woman) has rights because it has obligations for the good of society: the obligation to faithfully love each other, which naturally results in children (real love is fruitful) and the obligation to raise them. Based on natural law, positive law gives rights to couples: the good of the children is the good of society.

The State recognizes rights to married couples because they contribute to the good of society through procreation and education. Obviously homosexual can't procreate naturally (only through IVF which means killing innocent human beings).

That’s why Russia is desperate to help marriage, reduce abortion and ban promotion of homosexuality: they are disappearing as a nation with decreasing population. Same with many developed economies: depopulation bomb.


Contradictio in terminis

"The definition of marriage has always implied heterosexuality. The word ‘marriage,’ from the Latin maritare, linguistically has built into it the idea of procreation. Maritare not only means to marry but also to impregnate, which is why commentators would speak of women simultaneously being married and impregnated. In short, purely in terms of semantics, the very notion of marriage is defined in terms of impregnation. Historically in the West, even in non-Christian cultures, the very idea of “gay marriage” would  have been an oxymoron."

"When a girl "married," she was handed over by her father or guardian to the legal custody of the maritus, her bridegroom." Etymologically, it makes no sense to talk about a two husband "couple". Cf.

Naturally and legally in most countries, marriage is validated ("consumed") through a total union (when two become one). Same sex "marriages" are never valid because they are impossible to consume: they are incapable of natural sexual coupling, as irrational as trying to plug a female plug to a female plug. It’s a no brainer!

Same sex mariage is a contradiction in terms. The same goes for "couple" because they can't couple (copula) and for "pairs" (which remits to un-matching socks). It's better to talk about same sex relationships.

And they lived unhappily ever after...

Lifelong 100% faithful homo relationships are exceptions which prove the rule. Men's psychological personality is complementary to women's. Joining un-complementary psychological traits of two homosexuals is as unstable as trying to join 2 screws together or 2 nuts together, though some homo relationships last longer when based:
a) on servitude, where one has the money/power/appeal and the other, an exploited role, or
b) on selfishness, which leads to a business like relationship (negotiation of services).

Statistics prove that rotation and unfaithfulness is way higher in homosexual  relationships. Choosing homosex means choosing sentimental pain over and over again. In the any homosexual relationships, including the "stabilized", it's common to find verbal abuse, moral suasion, psychological and sexual harassment, threats, barter of favors, exchange of sex for material stuff, etc... all indicators of absence of love.

There is no real marital love in an homosexual relationship. It's not psychologically nor physically possible. Naturally, same sex pairs are unfit to procreate, multiply and form stable relationships. The natural sterility of homosex shows the natural futility of an homosexual relation. People endorsing homosexual marriage are actually supporting homosexual unhapiness. Homosexual relationships never get a happy ending.

The cure for AIDS and syphilis: the censored "secret"

Science says: AIDS is gay, gays are AIDS... number one vector of contagion.

Canadian Government: majority of homosexual men have HIV

but only 1.4% of adult population
Growing trend proves growing acceptance and perversion rather than other causes.

Male Homosexual Sex Fuelling Spread of HIV in Asia, Warns World Health Organization

US Center for Disease Control (CDC): 
Homosexuals 61% of new HIV infections but only 2% of population

AIDS Rate 50 Times Higher in Homosexual Men: Center for Disease Control

Yes, it's still the "pink disease".

The old 100% effective solution for AIDS: 
no homo-sex, 
no bi-sex, 
no sex outside faithful healthy marriage.

The same applies to syphilis:

CDC: Large increase in syphilis cases among Homosexual and Bisexual Men


Syphilis rates soar 134% among homosexual black men, fall among general population

Why? because there is no such thing as "safe sex" or safe homosex:
Condoms break sooner or later. Condoms are ineffective to prevent Sexually Transmitted Diseases, even mortal ones like HIV:

Ministry of Health Warning: homosex damages your health... way more than smoking

If smoking and advertising is forbidden, why not homosexuality?

Studies have shown that years of smoking shortens the lifespan of the smoker from 1 to 7 years.

Stats in developed countries (even in health-paradise Scandinavia) prove male homosexuals have a life expectancy 20 years shorter than normal guys. Even studies lead by gay groups have recognized it, for instance:

2005: Another Study Confirms Gay Life Expectancy 20 Years Shorter

2007: Discrimination Doesn't Drive Gays To An Early Grave
Dr. Cameron: “there was essentially no difference between the low average age of death for homosexuals in accepting societies – Norway and Denmark – and the United States, which, according to gay rights activists, is still “a homophobic society”. Canada’s census bureau also registered a sharp decline in the numbers of gays in old age.”

CDC study: gay students at greater risk for many unhealthy, unsafe behaviors


Same-Sex ‘Marriage’ a Health Risk Doctors Warn Parliamentarians

Doctors Say Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage Will Give False Impression Gay Sex is Safe

Physician Says Science of Medical Consequences of Homosexual Behaviour is Being Trumped by Political Agenda

The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality

Gay health risks

Homosexual men twice as likely to have cancer: study


Do Gay-Straight Alliances cause cancer?

Study: gay teens five times more likely to attempt suicide

Homosexual U.K. Documentarian Says Gay Lifestyle a “Sewer” of Casual Degrading Sex, Drug Abuse

As shown in the above studies, reduced life expectancy is not related only to AIDs but also to other serious problems caused by homosex. 

Stats in every single country show that homosexual relationships have unbelievable higher rates of depression, substance abuse, suicide, home “accidents”, domestic violence, murder, unfaithfulness, rotation, sexually transmitted diseases (including HIV/AIDS), etc.

Detractors usually say all those are also available to heterosexual people. True. But the probability of getting them due to homosex is incredibly higher. Homosex is a magnet to curse. There is one thing natural sex never gets: rectum destruction due to fisting or anal sex.

Scientifically proven: homosexual “lifestyle” is a death-style.

Incoherent: in order to save lives, Governments force cigarette companies to place warning signs in the packages or gives fines for not using seat belts or bike helmets, but on the other hand, they support the non-scientific gender ideology which leads to even more deaths!

People endorsing the gender ideology seem comfortable with a death-style causing people to die 20 years younger. The anti-scientific gender ideology is killing homosexuals! The so called homophobics are in fact the ones defending the homosexual's lives, while the gay-lovers are in fact gay-killers!

Gender ideology linked to abortion

Most bisexuals and homosexuals are in favor of abortion.

Statistics show a connection between bisexuality and abortion, way higher than heterosexuality. Bisexuals tends to be more promiscuous and riskier than heterosexuals: this ends up in more irresponsible pregnancies and surgical abortions.
Plus, since all non-barrier contraceptives are abortives, accepting the gender ideology means promoting more pharmaceutical and surgical abortions.

On the other hand, homosexuals can’t mate. They can adopt or they can recur to artificial fertilization. IVF always results in killing innocent children:
a) by embryo selection
b) by discarding embryos either artificially or “naturally”
c) by forming unsuitable embryos "destined" to fail
d) by freezing surplus production (freezing sooner or later results in death).
Note: since conception, genetic science considers the embryo a living human being, with unique human DNA different from the parents. For instance, the European Union has recognized that the embryos have human rights:

By recognizing a homosexual relationship as a marriage we are fostering IVF and murder. Not even mentioning exploitation: US gays travel to poor central America to rent wombs and there is more in India...

Homosex linked to child molestation

Nearly all Catholic Priests involved in child abuse were homosexuals:

That's one of the reasons Pope Benedict XVI banned their access to seminaries and priesthood.

Abusive Priests are a disgrace. Many people call themselves Christians but don't live up to what Christ taught:

What's God's Word on homosexual relations?

By the way, less than 1% of first world Catholic priests were accused and less than 0,5% in Latin America, where countries are not that immoral. This percentage raises up to 5% of school teachers (, rabbis and protestant "pastors", but the press preys only on priests. Why? Satan wants to attack celibacy and the Catholic Church, the only religion which is scientifically provable 

Now, let's deal with the scientific evidence linking homosexuality and child abuse:

- Homosexual Alfred Kinsey, the USA’s preeminent sexual researcher, found in 1948 that 37 percent of all male homosexuals admitted to having sex with children under 17 years old.

- A recent study published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior found that "The best epidemiological evidence indicates that only 2.4% of men attracted to adults prefer men.  In contrast, around 25-40% of men attracted to children prefer boys.  Thus, the rate of homosexual attraction is 6-20 times higher among pedophiles."

- Another study in the Archives of Sexual Behavior found that, "Pedophilia appears to have a greater than chance association with two other statistically infrequent phenomena.  The first of these is homosexuality ... Recent surveys estimate the prevalence of homosexuality, among men attracted to adults, in the neighborhood of 2%.  In contrast, the prevalence of homosexuality among pedophiles may be as high as 30-40%."

- A study in the Journal of Sex Research noted that "... the proportion of sex offenders against male children among homosexual men is substantially larger than the proportion of sex offenders against female children among heterosexual men ... the development of pedophilia is more closely linked with homosexuality than with heterosexuality."

- A study of 229 convicted child molesters published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior found that “eighty-six percent of [sexual] offenders against males described themselves as homosexual or bisexual.”

For the references for these findings please see Clowes full paper here.

And there's a lot more:

The Gay Report, published by homosexual researchers Jay and Young in 1979, revealed that 73 percent of male homosexuals surveyed had at some time had sex with boys 16 to 19 years of age or younger.
Cf. K. Jay and A. Young, The Gay Report (New York: Summit Books, 1979), p. 275.

Although homosexuals account for less than two percent of the population, they constitute about a third of child molesters.
Cf. K. Freund and R.I. Watson, "The Proportions of Heterosexual and Homosexual Pedophiles Among Sex Offenders Against Children: An Exploratory Study," Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 18 (Spring 1992): 3443, cited in "The Problem of Pedophilia," op. cit. Also, K. Freund and R.I. Watson, "Pedophilia and Heterosexuality vs. Homosexuality," Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 10 (Fall 1984): 197, cited in NARTH Fact Sheet.

Further, as noted by the Encino, Calif.-based National Association for research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), "since homosexual pedophiles victimize far more children than do heterosexual pedophiles, it is estimated that approximately 80 percent of pedophile victims are boys who have been molested by homosexual adultmales.
Cf. Thomas Schmidt, Straight and Narrow? Compassion and Clarity in the Homosexuality Debate (Downers Grove, IU.: Intervarsity Press), p. 114, cited in "The Problem of Pedophilia, op. cit., p. 2.

A study of Canadian pedophiles has shown that 30 percent of those studied admitted to having engaged In homosexual acts as adults, and 91% of the molesters of non-familial boys admitted to no lifetime sexual contact other than homosexual.
Cf. W. L. Marshall, et al., "Early onset and deviant sexuality in child molesters," Journal of interpersonal Violence 6 (1991): 323-336, cited in "Pedophilia: The Part of Homosexuality They Don't Want You to see," Colorado for Family Values Report, Vol. 14, March 1994.

Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., and Charles B. Johnson, Ph.D., conducted a content study of the personal ads in the Advocate, the national gay and lesbian newsmagazine and discovered that "chickens," a common term for underage boys sought for sex, were widely solicited. Many of the advertisements in the magazine solicited boys and teens from within a larger pool of prostitution ads.
Cf. Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., "A Content Analysis of 'The Advocate,"' unpublished manuscript p. 18, quoted in "Pedophilia: The Part of Homosexuality They Don't WantYou to See," ibid.

The authors also note a statement from a book review by homosexual activist Larry Kramer that the work, "like much canonized male homosexual literature, involves sexually predatory white men on the prowl for dark-skinned boys to gratify them.
Cf. From "Lany Kramer's Reading List," The Advocate, January 24, 1995, p. 99, cited in "Status Report," The Reisman & Johnson Report of Partner Solicitation Characteristics as a Reflection of More Sexual Orientation and the Threat to Children, First Principles Press, January l995.

In a 1985 study of the rates of molestation among homosexual pederasts compared to heterosexual pedophiles, Dr. Paul Cameron found the following:
153 pederasts had sexually molested 22,981 boys over an average period of 22 years. 
224 pedophiles had molested 4,435 girls over an average period of 18 years. 
The average pederast molested an average of 150 boys, and each heterosexual pedophile molested an average of 20 girls, a ratio of 7.5 to one.
Cf. Dr. Paul Cameron, “Homosexual Molestation of Children/Sexual Interaction of Teacher and Pupil,” Psychological Reports 57 (1985): 1227-1236.

And there is more:

Considering the scientifically proved probability between homosexuality and child molesting and ephebophilia, it's no surprise many homosexual groups aggressively demand to lower the age of sexual consent:

For example, the age of consent in Massachusetts was lowered to 16 years old!

The next link is supposed to be satirical, but sex-ed and anti-bullying programs are making sure it's not:,536/

Not satirical:

Anti-bullying Troyan horse:

Billions of tax dollars used to corrupt minors, and more to come:

“Safe Schools” Czar Dreamed of “Promoting Homosexuality” to Schoolchildren

“Safe Schools Czar” Admits to Ignoring Continued Homosexual Statutory Rape
Ardent Promoter of Child Molestation

Fistgate scandal

"Jennings partnered with Planned Parenthood to host a sex-education event now known as "Fistgate," due to the fact that at the event 14-21-year-olds were taught how to perform a dangerous and obscene sexual practice known as “fisting.” 

Gay columnist: let’s face it, we want to indoctrinate children

There's a saying in Argentina: confession from the other party, relieves us from proving.

The 21st century castrati

All cultures are against child mutilation, with the exception of muslim female castration. 

Most think that male castration is illegal, especially after the barbarity of eunuchs and castrati (castration of little boys for singing).

Homosexual and gender ideologists think they are above human rights and they have the right to castrate little kids!

A judge in California authorized a lesbian pair to chemically castrate their 11 year old adopted boy. Not the only case:
Those cases disregarded the scientific information for Gender Identity Disorder (GID)

It's irrational that gender ideologists claim that homosexuals are genetically predetermined, but on the other hand, they argue they need to block the natural male hormones the body develops in order to produce a homosexual.

This chemical castration is not reversible and causes permanent damages: who is going to pay for them? Who is responsible? You and all the readers who don't do anything about the gender ideology. If you don't want to be an accomplice at least forward this link!

Children raised by homosexuals 

a) As explained above, homosexual pairs are NOT a good environment for kids as so many objective studies and testimonies proved. Homosexual death-style harms not only the actors but the kids under their "custody". 

b) All scientific studies have proven that children thrive better in heterosexual stable marriages, as the American College of Pediatricians stated:

Why are we letting others to experiment with innocent children?

Gender ideology results in suffering and death, not only to active homosexuals but especially for "their" children, like our little martyr of truth, Jandre Botha:

Truth: the cure for homosexuality

So what if Animals Have Gay Sex? They Also Practice Polygamy, Pedophilia and Incest:

Since conception, people can’t change their DNA. Except some extremely rare diseases, either you have male DNA (XY chromosomes) or female DNA (XX). You can’t choose your sex. No matter how hard you try externally, you can’t change the DNA of EVERY SINGLE CELL OF YOUR BODY. It’s given.
This is no game: let’s remember the Canadian “doctor” who experimented sex change on a kid, raised as a girl, who later committed suicide.

Until the 80s, homosexuality was unanimously considered by science as a mental disorder and socially considered a moral perversion. Due to gay pressure groups (but zero scientific evidence), it was taken out of the “catalog” of psychiatric diseases. 

Serious studies have found a relationship between homosexuality and previous childhood problems (e.g. sexual abuse or violence, “strong” character of the mother in the case of men, paternal absence in the case of women, etc.):

Many psychologists and psychiatrists have succeeded in curing homosexuality by healing those childhood wounds:

If you are not a Christian, the following sentences might sound strange. Please visit the Scientific proof of religion first:

The Word of God gives another explanation to homosexuality:

One thing is to have homosexual attraction (temptation). Another totally different ballgame is to follow that attraction (which according to the Bible, is a mortal sin resulting in eternal damnation in hell, unless repentance before death). This cure is also possible:

Homophobic could be homo-friendly and vice versa

Discrimination? the anti-scientific gender ideology discriminates most of the world.

Imagine an alcoholic telling you:

I was born like this, genetically pre-determined to be a drunkard,
alcoholics are a special gender,
that's a natural fact: all animals can get drunk and we drink like animals,
It feels good. I am what I am... I like what I am!
I don't want to be cured: there's nothing to heal,
Alcoholics live 20 years less?
You love me? let me drink to death!
It's my life! my death-style! Let it be!
You dare correct me? you hate me!
You are an alco-phobic: can somebody expel this guy from the e-group?
The Bible says getting drunk is a mortal sin? then God and Christians are alco-phobics!
Psychologists dare offer treatment? we will get you disbarred!
Let's celebrate difference with a drink parade: alco-pride!
Studies link alcoholism to violence, murder, child molesting, rape, couple rotation, divorce, suicide, drugs, crime? it must be junk science based on few biased samples.
Our marriage is void? just because we were drunk? Or because I wanted to marry my sheep? But we loved each other!
We are capable of raising kids... as healthy as the ones from sober couples... No proofs? No  experiments with innocent children? you are alco-phobic!
Adoption agencies prefer sober couples? shut them down!
Judges must allow us to give alcohol to our adopted kid who wants to be like us.
Kids naturally love alcohol: we want compulsory alco-ed in schools so they can try getting drunk early. We need to lower the age of consent!
Whoever disagrees, is a discriminating alco-phobic filled with hatred!

The similarities to the gender ideology are not coincidence. For instance, you could change alcoholism for pedophilia or any other mental disorder/perversion and get a similar result. 

Someone objected that you could write something similar using "blacks" instead. False:
a) the homosexual act is freely chosen, not the phenotype. 
b) the homosexual act harms people, not the phenotype.

Unlike dark colored men, homosexuals choose to practice homosex, which harms them and eventually, everyone around (cf. above). The problem is not the homosexual tendency but the consent of the practice (sin).

Telling a homosexual that they are OK is like telling an alcoholic that it’s OK. That will not help that person find a cure, and it will make things even worse for them. That's why pro gays are in fact anti-gay, just as people endorsing free drugs are in fact enemies of drug addicts. It’s rather sad that most of the ad hominem attack as “homophobic” is really an attack against a gay friend, a true one, the one who is not afraid to be attacked in order to save his friend’s life and true happiness. Twisted eh! Not as much as the minds of those who try to turn black into white and vice versa.

The truth is, that you have to be "insane" to celebrate the diversity of drug addicts, alcoholics, nymphomania, etc. Those are problems to be treated, not healthy human categories to be promoted. Same with the mental disorder of homosexuality.

"Celebration of diversity" is positive but "unity in diversity" requires "charity in truth", "justice and peace". The only way to achieve that, is by placing the facts over false sentimentalism.

If you accept the gender ideology, then you have no arguments against the next step,   pedophilia as a sexual orientation:

or even incest:


Same sex relationships should NEVER EVER have the rights of couples of different sexes.

Why spend money subsidizing such a self and social-damaging same-sex relationship and not in fostering real heterosexual marriages?
Same sex pairs should never receive medical insurance.
If not, the discrimination and prejudice lies against real marriage.
The same as pro abortion activists, gay-"friends" are communists in disguise: they want other people's money to be used for the gay agenda but most of them wouldn't even donate money for gay lobbyists or hire a gay for their own firms.

Even if there's an innocent little child involved (either adopted or through IVF), the decision to prioritize scarce resources to heterosexual marriages does not mean leaving the child to sleep on the street.

But the key question is: what would the moral responsibility of the community be if the child is harmed or murdered as in the case of martyr Jandre described in the beginning?

Latin proverb from at least 1340 AC:
pomum compuctum cito corrumpit sibi junctum
(the rotten apple, ruins the barrel)

Before expressing an opinion, it's better to refer to facts. Please READ with an OPEN mind the scientific links. Much data comes from unquestionable sources such as population census, the US Center for Disease Control (CDC) and other countries' agencies or even studies conducted by gay groups! 

The fact that some scientific references were informed by one source doesn't invalidate them. The scientific method doesn't invalidate data just because it was quoted by a  preferred editor: that's an ad hominem argument (ad editor).

If you are opened to truth, you'd go to the data and analyse it instead of debasing yourself with irrational ad hominem comments against the sources.

Hopefully, the homophobic will refrain from hate email and other ad hominem attacks, which confirm the title: the intolerance of the self-called "tolerant". Unlike them, this article wants to help homosexuals. Love starts with truth.

No comments:

Post a Comment